Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

BitGo vs iTrust Capital

BitGo leads overall with a score of 69/100. BitGo wins in 4 categories, iTrust Capital wins in 1.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportBitGoiTrust Capital
Category
BitGo
B-
iTrust Capital
C+
Overall Score
69
62
Custody & Security
35% weight
65
45
Ease of Use
20% weight
75
78
Fees
15% weight
70
70
Features
10% weight
80
65
Transparency
10% weight
60
58
Support
10% weight
75
60
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
65
BitGo
vs
45
iTrust Capital
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
75
BitGo
vs
78
iTrust Capital
Fees
15% of overall score
70
BitGo
vs
70
iTrust Capital
Features
10% of overall score
80
BitGo
vs
65
iTrust Capital
Transparency
10% of overall score
60
BitGo
vs
58
iTrust Capital
Support
10% of overall score
75
BitGo
vs
60
iTrust Capital
Fee Comparison
BitGo
Custom
Min: $100K+
iTrust Capital
1% per trade
Min: $0
Custody Features
BitGo
Multisig
Multi-Institution
No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
Multi-Jurisdiction
Inheritance
Segregated Insurance
IRA
Lending
Buy/Sell
Dynasty Trusts
iTrust Capital

N/A

Our Analysis

BitGo vs iTrust Capital: What the Data Shows

BitGo (dedicated custody) and iTrust Capital (Bitcoin IRA) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — BitGo at 69/100 (B-) and iTrust Capital at 62/100 (C+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 20 points toward BitGo (65 vs. 45). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but BitGo mitigates it more effectively through its Qualified Custodian approach.

The Custody Question

Neither BitGo nor iTrust Capital has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. BitGo uses Qualified Custodian and iTrust Capital uses Custodial IRA. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

BitGo edges out iTrust Capital by 7 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize qualified custodian. hot, warm, and cold wallet options. $250m insurance. over crypto ira with 30+ assets. 24/7 trading. roth and traditional.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — BitGo is built for institutions, while iTrust Capital serves crypto ira. One thing to watch with iTrust Capital: single custodian. broad crypto focus, not bitcoin-specialized..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, BitGo or iTrust Capital?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, BitGo scores higher at 69/100 compared to 62/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is BitGo safe for storing Bitcoin?

BitGo scored 65/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Qualified Custodian. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does iTrust Capital have a single point of failure?

Yes. iTrust Capital uses a Custodial IRA model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for BitGo vs iTrust Capital?

BitGo charges Custom. iTrust Capital charges 1% per trade. BitGo scored 70/100 on fees versus 70/100 for iTrust Capital in our methodology.