Scores last updated
Fit follows the custody model, not the brand.
You hold most keys, the provider holds one, and no single party can move funds alone.
A regulated institution holds keys in segregated accounts under a legal framework built for it.
Casa and Fidelity Digital Assets both operate in the dedicated custody space, but they take fundamentally different approaches to how your bitcoin is held. The scores are close — Casa at 82/100 (A-) and Fidelity Digital Assets at 76/100 (B). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.
On custody and security, these two are within 0 points of each other (90 vs. 90). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure. Casa's strongest advantage is in features (80 vs. 55), where Casa's product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference.
Here's the key difference: Casa has no single point of failure (Collaborative Multisig), while Fidelity Digital Assets does (Qualified Custodian). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.
Casa edges out Fidelity Digital Assets by 6 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize best self-custody ux. mobile key management. inheritance protocol. over backed by fidelity's brand and balance sheet. regulated. soc 2 type 2.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Casa is built for self-custody, while Fidelity Digital Assets serves tradfi. One thing to watch with Fidelity Digital Assets: single custodian. traditional finance approach to a novel asset class..
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Casa scores higher at 82/100 compared to 76/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Casa scored 90/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Collaborative Multisig. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Yes. Fidelity Digital Assets uses a Qualified Custodian model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
Casa charges $30 - $250/yr. Fidelity Digital Assets charges Custom. Casa scored 75/100 on fees versus 72/100 for Fidelity Digital Assets in our methodology.
Casa offers dedicated inheritance or beneficiary features. Fidelity Digital Assets does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.
Casa's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Fidelity Digital Assets's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.
Casa involves the holder in key control. Fidelity Digital Assets manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.