Scores last updated
Fit follows the custody model, not the brand.
You hold most keys, the provider holds one, and no single party can move funds alone.
One company holds the keys; you hold a claim on the company.
N/A
Casa (dedicated custody) and Kraken (exchange and brokerage) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Casa scores 82/100 (A-) versus 67/100 (B-) for Kraken. The 15-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.
Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 28 points toward Casa (90 vs. 62). Casa eliminates single points of failure in its custody architecture, while Kraken relies on a model where one compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. On fees, Casa wins by 5 points. Casa charges $30 - $250/yr compared to 0.16% - 0.26% at Kraken. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators.
Here's the key difference: Casa has no single point of failure (Collaborative Multisig), while Kraken does (Single Custodian). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.
Casa is the clear choice here, outscoring Kraken by 15 points across our six-category methodology. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Casa is built for self-custody, while Kraken serves traders. One thing to watch with Kraken: single custodian. broader crypto exchange, not bitcoin-focused.. The data speaks for itself — but always verify our methodology and do your own due diligence before moving bitcoin to any platform.
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Casa scores higher at 82/100 compared to 67/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Casa scored 90/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Collaborative Multisig. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Yes. Kraken uses a Single Custodian model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
Casa charges $30 - $250/yr. Kraken charges 0.16% - 0.26%. Casa scored 75/100 on fees versus 70/100 for Kraken in our methodology.
Casa offers dedicated inheritance or beneficiary features. Kraken does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.
Casa's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Kraken's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.
Casa involves the holder in key control. Kraken manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.