Casa vs Relai

Casa (dedicated custody) and Relai (exchange and brokerage) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Casa at 83/100 (A-) and Relai at 78/100 (B+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

On custody and security, these two are within 4 points of each other (86 vs. 82). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure. On fees, Casa wins by 5 points. Casa charges $30 - $250/yr compared to 1% - 1.5% at Relai. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Casa's strongest advantage is in transparency (84 vs. 65), where Casa's approach to proof-of-reserves and public documentation makes a measurable difference. Relai stands out on ease of use (88 vs. 78), reflecting Relai's user experience and onboarding flow.

The Custody Question

Both Casa and Relai have addressed the single-point-of-failure problem — neither relies on a single custodian or a single set of keys. That puts both platforms ahead of the majority of the industry. The difference comes down to implementation: Casa uses Self-Custody Multisig, while Relai uses Non-Custodial.

Bottom Line

Casa edges out Relai by 5 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize best self-custody ux. mobile key management. inheritance protocol. over bitcoin-only. european. auto-dca directly to your own wallet.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Casa is built for self-custody, while Relai serves europe. One thing to watch with Relai: limited to european users. fewer financial services than us alternatives..