Casa vs Unchained

Casa (dedicated custody) and Unchained (exchange and brokerage) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Both platforms earned a A- rating in our scoring methodology, landing at 83/100. The tie breaks down in the category details.

Where Each Platform Wins

On custody and security, these two are within 0 points of each other (86 vs. 86). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure.

The Custody Question

Both Casa and Unchained have addressed the single-point-of-failure problem — neither relies on a single custodian or a single set of keys. That puts both platforms ahead of the majority of the industry. The difference comes down to implementation: Casa uses Self-Custody Multisig, while Unchained uses Collaborative Multisig.

Bottom Line

These two platforms score identically at 83/100. Your choice comes down to what you prioritize. Casa excels at best self-custody ux. mobile key management. inheritance protocol., while Unchained is known for buy directly into collaborative custody. ira, lending, and inheritance built in.. Review the category breakdowns above and consider which trade-offs matter most for how you plan to hold bitcoin.