Casa vs Unchained IRA

Casa (dedicated custody) and Unchained IRA (Bitcoin IRA) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Casa at 83/100 (A-) and Unchained IRA at 81/100 (B+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

On custody and security, these two are within 2 points of each other (86 vs. 84). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure.

The Custody Question

Both Casa and Unchained IRA have addressed the single-point-of-failure problem — neither relies on a single custodian or a single set of keys. That puts both platforms ahead of the majority of the industry. The difference comes down to implementation: Casa uses Self-Custody Multisig, while Unchained IRA uses Collaborative Multisig IRA.

Bottom Line

Casa edges out Unchained IRA by 2 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize best self-custody ux. mobile key management. inheritance protocol. over only ira where you hold keys. 2-of-3 multisig. tax-advantaged bitcoin.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Casa is built for self-custody, while Unchained IRA serves self-sovereign retirement. One thing to watch with Unchained IRA: requires hardware devices. sdira complexity. irs reporting burden..