PROOFOFCUSTODY
Scores
Incidents
Learn
About
Get the Report
PROOFOFCUSTODY

The independent scoring system for Bitcoin custody. Every platform scored and ranked.

$1B+ in assets under custody expertise

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PLATFORM SCORES
All ScoresCompareMethodologyIndependence StandardDataCustody Assessment
LEARN
Bitcoin 101Custody GuidesCustody InsuranceIs Your Setup Safe?Custody TimelineIncidentsFAQQuiz
COMPANY
AboutAuthorsEditorial IndependenceChangelogCorrections
RESOURCES
PodcastPressReport
CONNECT
Twitter / XLinkedInYouTubehello@proofofcustody.io
2026 Proof of Custody. Published by Onramp Bitcoin. Editorial Independence.PrivacyTermsproofofcustody.io
Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Choice by Kingdom Trust vs iTrust Capital

Scores last updated September 22, 2026

73
Choice by Kingdom Trust
BSPOF
Qualified Custodian IRA
65
iTrust Capital
C+SPOF
Custodial IRA
Choice by Kingdom Trust leads overall with a score of 73/100. Choice by Kingdom Trust wins in 3 categories, iTrust Capital wins in 2.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportChoice by Kingdom TrustiTrust Capital
Category
Choice by Kingdom Trust
B
iTrust Capital
C+
Overall Score
73
65
Custody & Security
35% weight
85
65
Ease of Use
20% weight
78
70
Fees
15% weight
70
68
Features
10% weight
60
62
Transparency
10% weight
55
55
Support
10% weight
60
68

Who each is for

Fit follows the custody model, not the brand.

Choice by Kingdom Trust

Qualified custodian

A regulated institution holds keys in segregated accounts under a legal framework built for it.

A good fit for
  • Entities that must satisfy a regulator, an auditor, or an investment-committee mandate
  • Holders who want institutional process — SOC audits, segregation, named accountability — and accept institutional control
  • Estates and trusts whose lawyers need a counterparty that courts already understand
The wrong choice for
  • Anyone whose core requirement is that no single institution can move the coins — one institution can
  • Privacy-focused holders: the custodian, its regulator, and its subpoena inbox all know your position
  • Small balances: minimums and fees are built for institutions
iTrust Capital

Exchange / single custodian account

One company holds the keys; you hold a claim on the company.

A good fit for
  • First purchases and small balances, where losing the amount would sting but not change your life
  • Active traders who need the coins next to the order book
  • Anyone still deciding — parking funds briefly at a reputable exchange beats a rushed self-custody setup you have not tested
The wrong choice for
  • Life-changing amounts: you are an unsecured creditor in the failure case, and every era of our incident registry includes this exact loss
  • Long horizons: platform risk compounds with time in a way price risk does not
  • Anyone whose plan for the provider failing is 'they seem too big to fail' — that was said of every name in the registry
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
85
Choice by Kingdom Trust
vs
65
iTrust Capital
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
78
Choice by Kingdom Trust
vs
70
iTrust Capital
Fees
15% of overall score
70
Choice by Kingdom Trust
vs
68
iTrust Capital
Features
10% of overall score
60
Choice by Kingdom Trust
vs
62
iTrust Capital
Transparency
10% of overall score
55
Choice by Kingdom Trust
vs
55
iTrust Capital
Support
10% of overall score
60
Choice by Kingdom Trust
vs
68
iTrust Capital
Fee Comparison
Choice by Kingdom Trust
1% annual + trading
Min: $0
iTrust Capital
1% per trade, $0 annual
Min: $0
Our Analysis

Choice by Kingdom Trust vs iTrust Capital: What the Data Shows

Choice by Kingdom Trust and iTrust Capital both operate in the Bitcoin IRA space, but they take fundamentally different approaches to how your bitcoin is held. The scores are close — Choice by Kingdom Trust at 73/100 (B) and iTrust Capital at 65/100 (C+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 20 points toward Choice by Kingdom Trust (85 vs. 65). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but Choice by Kingdom Trust mitigates it more effectively through its Qualified Custodian IRA approach.

The Custody Question

Neither Choice by Kingdom Trust nor iTrust Capital has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Choice by Kingdom Trust uses Qualified Custodian IRA and iTrust Capital uses Custodial IRA. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Choice by Kingdom Trust edges out iTrust Capital by 8 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize regulated ira custodian. bitcoin + alts. roth and traditional. over crypto ira with 30+ assets. 24/7 trading. roth and traditional.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Choice by Kingdom Trust is built for multi-asset ira, while iTrust Capital serves crypto ira. One thing to watch with iTrust Capital: single custodian. broad crypto focus, not bitcoin-specialized..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Choice by Kingdom Trust or iTrust Capital?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Choice by Kingdom Trust scores higher at 73/100 compared to 65/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Choice by Kingdom Trust safe for storing Bitcoin?

Choice by Kingdom Trust scored 85/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Qualified Custodian IRA. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does iTrust Capital have a single point of failure?

Yes. iTrust Capital uses a Custodial IRA model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Choice by Kingdom Trust vs iTrust Capital?

Choice by Kingdom Trust charges 1% annual + trading. iTrust Capital charges 1% per trade, $0 annual. Choice by Kingdom Trust scored 70/100 on fees versus 68/100 for iTrust Capital in our methodology.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better for inheritance, Choice by Kingdom Trust or iTrust Capital?+

Choice by Kingdom Trust does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. iTrust Capital does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.

Which has insurance, Choice by Kingdom Trust or iTrust Capital?+

Choice by Kingdom Trust's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. iTrust Capital's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.

Which requires me to hold my own keys, Choice by Kingdom Trust or iTrust Capital?+

Choice by Kingdom Trust manages keys for you; you hold none. iTrust Capital manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.

Choice by Kingdom Trust Full ReviewiTrust Capital Full Review