Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Copper vs Shakepay

Copper leads overall with a score of 70/100. Copper wins in 4 categories, Shakepay wins in 2.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportCopperShakepay
Category
Copper
B-
Shakepay
C+
Overall Score
70
63
Custody & Security
35% weight
72
40
Ease of Use
20% weight
65
88
Fees
15% weight
70
72
Features
10% weight
75
62
Transparency
10% weight
68
58
Support
10% weight
70
65
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
72
Copper
vs
40
Shakepay
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
65
Copper
vs
88
Shakepay
Fees
15% of overall score
70
Copper
vs
72
Shakepay
Features
10% of overall score
75
Copper
vs
62
Shakepay
Transparency
10% of overall score
68
Copper
vs
58
Shakepay
Support
10% of overall score
70
Copper
vs
65
Shakepay
Fee Comparison
Copper
Custom
Min: Institutional
Shakepay
~1.5% spread
Min: $0
Custody Features
Copper
Multisig
Multi-Institution
No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
Multi-Jurisdiction
Inheritance
Segregated Insurance
IRA
Lending
Buy/Sell
Dynasty Trusts
Shakepay

N/A

Our Analysis

Copper vs Shakepay: What the Data Shows

Copper (dedicated custody) and Shakepay (fintech) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Copper at 70/100 (B-) and Shakepay at 63/100 (C+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 32 points toward Copper (72 vs. 40). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but Copper mitigates it more effectively through its MPC + ClearLoop approach. Shakepay stands out on ease of use (88 vs. 65), reflecting Shakepay's user experience and onboarding flow.

The Custody Question

Neither Copper nor Shakepay has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Copper uses MPC + ClearLoop and Shakepay uses Single Custodian. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Copper edges out Shakepay by 7 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize off-exchange settlement via clearloop. mpc technology. over canadian bitcoin app. shake for sats feature. visa card with btc rewards.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Copper is built for institutions, while Shakepay serves canadian. One thing to watch with Shakepay: single custodian. canada-only. spread-based pricing..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Copper or Shakepay?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Copper scores higher at 70/100 compared to 63/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Copper safe for storing Bitcoin?

Copper scored 72/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as MPC + ClearLoop. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does Shakepay have a single point of failure?

Yes. Shakepay uses a Single Custodian model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Copper vs Shakepay?

Copper charges Custom. Shakepay charges ~1.5% spread. Copper scored 70/100 on fees versus 72/100 for Shakepay in our methodology.