Fireblocks vs iTrust Capital
N/A
Fireblocks vs iTrust Capital: What the Data Shows
Fireblocks (dedicated custody) and iTrust Capital (Bitcoin IRA) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Fireblocks at 63/100 (C+) and iTrust Capital at 62/100 (C+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.
Where Each Platform Wins
On custody and security, these two are within 0 points of each other (45 vs. 45). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure. On fees, iTrust Capital wins by 12 points. iTrust Capital charges 1% per trade compared to Custom at Fireblocks. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Fireblocks's strongest advantage is in features (80 vs. 65), where Fireblocks's product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference.
The Custody Question
Neither Fireblocks nor iTrust Capital has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Fireblocks uses MPC Technology and iTrust Capital uses Custodial IRA. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.
Bottom Line
Fireblocks edges out iTrust Capital by 1 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize multi-party computation infrastructure. 1,800+ institutions. broad defi connectivity. over crypto ira with 30+ assets. 24/7 trading. roth and traditional.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Fireblocks is built for institutions, while iTrust Capital serves crypto ira. One thing to watch with iTrust Capital: single custodian. broad crypto focus, not bitcoin-specialized..
Which is better, Fireblocks or iTrust Capital?
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Fireblocks scores higher at 63/100 compared to 62/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Is Fireblocks safe for storing Bitcoin?
Fireblocks scored 45/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as MPC Technology. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Does iTrust Capital have a single point of failure?
Yes. iTrust Capital uses a Custodial IRA model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
What are the fees for Fireblocks vs iTrust Capital?
Fireblocks charges Custom. iTrust Capital charges 1% per trade. Fireblocks scored 58/100 on fees versus 70/100 for iTrust Capital in our methodology.