Foundation (Passport) vs iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
N/A
Foundation (Passport) vs iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT): What the Data Shows
Foundation (Passport) (dedicated custody) and iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) (ETF and fund) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Foundation (Passport) at 82/100 (A-) and iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) at 77/100 (B+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.
Where Each Platform Wins
Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 10 points toward Foundation (Passport) (85 vs. 75). Foundation (Passport) eliminates single points of failure in its custody architecture, while iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) relies on a model where one compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. On fees, Foundation (Passport) wins by 10 points. Foundation (Passport) charges ~$200 compared to 0.25% expense ratio at iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Foundation (Passport)'s strongest advantage is in features (70 vs. 55), where Foundation (Passport)'s product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference. iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) stands out on ease of use (90 vs. 80), reflecting iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)'s user experience and onboarding flow.
The Custody Question
Here's the key difference: Foundation (Passport) has no single point of failure (Hardware Wallet), while iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) does (ETF — Coinbase Custody). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.
Bottom Line
Foundation (Passport) edges out iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) by 5 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize open source hardware and software. beautiful industrial design. bitcoin-only. over largest spot bitcoin etf by aum. blackrock brand. deep liquidity.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Foundation (Passport) is built for bitcoin purists, while iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) serves tradfi investors. One thing to watch with iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT): single custodian (coinbase). no direct btc withdrawal. counterparty risk via shares..
Which is better, Foundation (Passport) or iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Foundation (Passport) scores higher at 82/100 compared to 77/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Is Foundation (Passport) safe for storing Bitcoin?
Foundation (Passport) scored 85/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Hardware Wallet. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Does iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) have a single point of failure?
Yes. iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) uses a ETF — Coinbase Custody model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
What are the fees for Foundation (Passport) vs iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?
Foundation (Passport) charges ~$200. iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) charges 0.25% expense ratio. Foundation (Passport) scored 90/100 on fees versus 80/100 for iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) in our methodology.