Foundation (Passport) vs Securitize
Foundation (Passport) vs Securitize: What the Data Shows
Foundation (Passport) (dedicated custody) and Securitize (tokenized-rwa) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Foundation (Passport) at 82/100 (A-) and Securitize at 76/100 (B). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.
Where Each Platform Wins
Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 7 points toward Foundation (Passport) (85 vs. 78). Foundation (Passport) eliminates single points of failure in its custody architecture, while Securitize relies on a model where one compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. On fees, Foundation (Passport) wins by 22 points. Foundation (Passport) charges ~$200 compared to Platform + origination fees at Securitize. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Securitize stands out on features (82 vs. 70), reflecting Securitize's product breadth and tooling.
The Custody Question
Here's the key difference: Foundation (Passport) has no single point of failure (Hardware Wallet), while Securitize does (SEC Transfer Agent + FINRA Broker-Dealer). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.
Bottom Line
Foundation (Passport) edges out Securitize by 6 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize open source hardware and software. beautiful industrial design. bitcoin-only. over leading tokenization platform. sec-registered transfer agent and finra broker-dealer. powers blackrock buidl, hamilton lane, kkr tokenized funds. secondary market trading via securitize markets.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Foundation (Passport) is built for bitcoin purists, while Securitize serves asset managers & institutions. One thing to watch with Securitize: single platform dependency for tokenization and transfer agent services. revenue concentrated in few large clients. smart contract risk..
Which is better, Foundation (Passport) or Securitize?
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Foundation (Passport) scores higher at 82/100 compared to 76/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Is Foundation (Passport) safe for storing Bitcoin?
Foundation (Passport) scored 85/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Hardware Wallet. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Does Securitize have a single point of failure?
Yes. Securitize uses a SEC Transfer Agent + FINRA Broker-Dealer model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
What are the fees for Foundation (Passport) vs Securitize?
Foundation (Passport) charges ~$200. Securitize charges Platform + origination fees. Foundation (Passport) scored 90/100 on fees versus 68/100 for Securitize in our methodology.