Foundation (Passport) vs Strike (Global)
N/A
Foundation (Passport) vs Strike (Global): What the Data Shows
Foundation (Passport) (dedicated custody) and Strike (Global) (fintech) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Foundation (Passport) scores 82/100 (A-) versus 71/100 (B-) for Strike (Global). The 11-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.
Where Each Platform Wins
Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 25 points toward Foundation (Passport) (85 vs. 60). Foundation (Passport) eliminates single points of failure in its custody architecture, while Strike (Global) relies on a model where one compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. On fees, Foundation (Passport) wins by 10 points. Foundation (Passport) charges ~$200 compared to ~0.3% spread at Strike (Global). Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Strike (Global) stands out on features (80 vs. 70), reflecting Strike (Global)'s product breadth and tooling.
The Custody Question
Here's the key difference: Foundation (Passport) has no single point of failure (Hardware Wallet), while Strike (Global) does (Custodial). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.
Bottom Line
Foundation (Passport) edges out Strike (Global) by 11 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize open source hardware and software. beautiful industrial design. bitcoin-only. over global remittances. near-zero fee btc buys. lightning-native.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Foundation (Passport) is built for bitcoin purists, while Strike (Global) serves international. One thing to watch with Strike (Global): custodial. limited markets. not designed for large holdings..
Which is better, Foundation (Passport) or Strike (Global)?
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Foundation (Passport) scores higher at 82/100 compared to 71/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Is Foundation (Passport) safe for storing Bitcoin?
Foundation (Passport) scored 85/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Hardware Wallet. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Does Strike (Global) have a single point of failure?
Yes. Strike (Global) uses a Custodial model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
What are the fees for Foundation (Passport) vs Strike (Global)?
Foundation (Passport) charges ~$200. Strike (Global) charges ~0.3% spread. Foundation (Passport) scored 90/100 on fees versus 80/100 for Strike (Global) in our methodology.