Franklin Templeton BENJI vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Franklin Templeton BENJI vs Fidelity Digital Assets: What the Data Shows
Franklin Templeton BENJI (tokenized-treasury) and Fidelity Digital Assets (dedicated custody) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Franklin Templeton BENJI at 77/100 (B+) and Fidelity Digital Assets at 76/100 (B). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.
Where Each Platform Wins
On custody and security, these two are within 2 points of each other (82 vs. 80). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure. On fees, Franklin Templeton BENJI wins by 5 points. Franklin Templeton BENJI charges 0.20% expense ratio compared to Custom at Fidelity Digital Assets. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Franklin Templeton BENJI's strongest advantage is in transparency (82 vs. 70), where Franklin Templeton BENJI's approach to proof-of-reserves and public documentation makes a measurable difference. Fidelity Digital Assets stands out on support (85 vs. 75), reflecting Fidelity Digital Assets's customer support infrastructure and response times.
The Custody Question
Neither Franklin Templeton BENJI nor Fidelity Digital Assets has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Franklin Templeton BENJI uses SEC-Registered Fund (Franklin Templeton) and Fidelity Digital Assets uses Qualified Custodian. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.
Bottom Line
Franklin Templeton BENJI edges out Fidelity Digital Assets by 1 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize first sec-registered fund to use public blockchain for share tracking. franklin onchain us government money fund accessible via the benji app. $700m+ aum. stellar and ethereum deployment. over backed by fidelity's brand and balance sheet. regulated. soc 2 type 2.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Franklin Templeton BENJI is built for retail & institutional, while Fidelity Digital Assets serves tradfi. One thing to watch with Fidelity Digital Assets: single custodian. traditional finance approach to a novel asset class..
Which is better, Franklin Templeton BENJI or Fidelity Digital Assets?
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Franklin Templeton BENJI scores higher at 77/100 compared to 76/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Is Franklin Templeton BENJI safe for storing Bitcoin?
Franklin Templeton BENJI scored 82/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as SEC-Registered Fund (Franklin Templeton). Always verify these details and do your own research.
Does Fidelity Digital Assets have a single point of failure?
Yes. Fidelity Digital Assets uses a Qualified Custodian model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
What are the fees for Franklin Templeton BENJI vs Fidelity Digital Assets?
Franklin Templeton BENJI charges 0.20% expense ratio. Fidelity Digital Assets charges Custom. Franklin Templeton BENJI scored 75/100 on fees versus 70/100 for Fidelity Digital Assets in our methodology.