Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Kraken vs Shakepay

Kraken leads overall with a score of 68/100. Kraken wins in 5 categories, Shakepay wins in 1.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportKrakenShakepay
Category
Kraken
B-
Shakepay
C+
Overall Score
68
63
Custody & Security
35% weight
50
40
Ease of Use
20% weight
80
88
Fees
15% weight
75
72
Features
10% weight
70
62
Transparency
10% weight
70
58
Support
10% weight
75
65
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
50
Kraken
vs
40
Shakepay
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
80
Kraken
vs
88
Shakepay
Fees
15% of overall score
75
Kraken
vs
72
Shakepay
Features
10% of overall score
70
Kraken
vs
62
Shakepay
Transparency
10% of overall score
70
Kraken
vs
58
Shakepay
Support
10% of overall score
75
Kraken
vs
65
Shakepay
Fee Comparison
Kraken
0.16% - 0.26%
Min: $0
Shakepay
~1.5% spread
Min: $0
Our Analysis

Kraken vs Shakepay: What the Data Shows

Kraken (exchange and brokerage) and Shakepay (fintech) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Kraken at 68/100 (B-) and Shakepay at 63/100 (C+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 10 points toward Kraken (50 vs. 40). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but Kraken mitigates it more effectively through its Single Custodian approach. Kraken's strongest advantage is in transparency (70 vs. 58), where Kraken's approach to proof-of-reserves and public documentation makes a measurable difference.

The Custody Question

Neither Kraken nor Shakepay has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Kraken uses Single Custodian and Shakepay uses Single Custodian. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Kraken edges out Shakepay by 5 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize competitive fees. proof of reserves published. strong security track record. over canadian bitcoin app. shake for sats feature. visa card with btc rewards.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Kraken is built for traders, while Shakepay serves canadian. One thing to watch with Shakepay: single custodian. canada-only. spread-based pricing..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Kraken or Shakepay?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Kraken scores higher at 68/100 compared to 63/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Kraken safe for storing Bitcoin?

Kraken scored 50/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Single Custodian. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does Shakepay have a single point of failure?

Yes. Shakepay uses a Single Custodian model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Kraken vs Shakepay?

Kraken charges 0.16% - 0.26%. Shakepay charges ~1.5% spread. Kraken scored 75/100 on fees versus 72/100 for Shakepay in our methodology.