Relai vs Strike (Global)

Relai (exchange and brokerage) and Strike (Global) (fintech) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Relai at 78/100 (B+) and Strike (Global) at 71/100 (B-). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 22 points toward Relai (82 vs. 60). Relai eliminates single points of failure in its custody architecture, while Strike (Global) relies on a model where one compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. On fees, Strike (Global) wins by 10 points. Strike (Global) charges ~0.3% spread compared to 1% - 1.5% at Relai. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators.

The Custody Question

Here's the key difference: Relai has no single point of failure (Non-Custodial), while Strike (Global) does (Custodial). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.

Bottom Line

Relai edges out Strike (Global) by 7 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize bitcoin-only. european. auto-dca directly to your own wallet. over global remittances. near-zero fee btc buys. lightning-native.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Relai is built for europe, while Strike (Global) serves international. One thing to watch with Strike (Global): custodial. limited markets. not designed for large holdings..