Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Shakepay vs iTrust Capital

Shakepay leads overall with a score of 63/100. Shakepay wins in 3 categories, iTrust Capital wins in 2.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportShakepayiTrust Capital
Category
Shakepay
C+
iTrust Capital
C+
Overall Score
63
62
Custody & Security
35% weight
40
45
Ease of Use
20% weight
88
78
Fees
15% weight
72
70
Features
10% weight
62
65
Transparency
10% weight
58
58
Support
10% weight
65
60
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
40
Shakepay
vs
45
iTrust Capital
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
88
Shakepay
vs
78
iTrust Capital
Fees
15% of overall score
72
Shakepay
vs
70
iTrust Capital
Features
10% of overall score
62
Shakepay
vs
65
iTrust Capital
Transparency
10% of overall score
58
Shakepay
vs
58
iTrust Capital
Support
10% of overall score
65
Shakepay
vs
60
iTrust Capital
Fee Comparison
Shakepay
~1.5% spread
Min: $0
iTrust Capital
1% per trade
Min: $0
Our Analysis

Shakepay vs iTrust Capital: What the Data Shows

Shakepay (fintech) and iTrust Capital (Bitcoin IRA) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Shakepay at 63/100 (C+) and iTrust Capital at 62/100 (C+). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 5 points toward iTrust Capital (45 vs. 40). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but iTrust Capital mitigates it more effectively through its Custodial IRA approach. Shakepay's strongest advantage is in ease of use (88 vs. 78), where Shakepay's user experience and onboarding flow makes a measurable difference.

The Custody Question

Neither Shakepay nor iTrust Capital has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Shakepay uses Single Custodian and iTrust Capital uses Custodial IRA. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Shakepay edges out iTrust Capital by 1 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize canadian bitcoin app. shake for sats feature. visa card with btc rewards. over crypto ira with 30+ assets. 24/7 trading. roth and traditional.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Shakepay is built for canadian, while iTrust Capital serves crypto ira. One thing to watch with iTrust Capital: single custodian. broad crypto focus, not bitcoin-specialized..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Shakepay or iTrust Capital?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Shakepay scores higher at 63/100 compared to 62/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Shakepay safe for storing Bitcoin?

Shakepay scored 40/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Single Custodian. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does iTrust Capital have a single point of failure?

Yes. iTrust Capital uses a Custodial IRA model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Shakepay vs iTrust Capital?

Shakepay charges ~1.5% spread. iTrust Capital charges 1% per trade. Shakepay scored 72/100 on fees versus 70/100 for iTrust Capital in our methodology.