Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Strike vs iTrust Capital

Strike leads overall with a score of 74/100. Strike wins in 6 categories, iTrust Capital wins in 0.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportStrikeiTrust Capital
Category
Strike
B
iTrust Capital
C+
Overall Score
74
62
Custody & Security
35% weight
65
45
Ease of Use
20% weight
85
78
Fees
15% weight
85
70
Features
10% weight
85
65
Transparency
10% weight
60
58
Support
10% weight
80
60
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
65
Strike
vs
45
iTrust Capital
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
85
Strike
vs
78
iTrust Capital
Fees
15% of overall score
85
Strike
vs
70
iTrust Capital
Features
10% of overall score
85
Strike
vs
65
iTrust Capital
Transparency
10% of overall score
60
Strike
vs
58
iTrust Capital
Support
10% of overall score
80
Strike
vs
60
iTrust Capital
Fee Comparison
Strike
~0.3% spread
Min: $0
iTrust Capital
1% per trade
Min: $0
Our Analysis

Strike vs iTrust Capital: What the Data Shows

Strike (exchange and brokerage) and iTrust Capital (Bitcoin IRA) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Strike scores 74/100 (B) versus 62/100 (C+) for iTrust Capital. The 12-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 20 points toward Strike (65 vs. 45). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but Strike mitigates it more effectively through its Single Custodian approach. On fees, Strike wins by 15 points. Strike charges ~0.3% spread compared to 1% per trade at iTrust Capital. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators.

The Custody Question

Neither Strike nor iTrust Capital has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Strike uses Single Custodian and iTrust Capital uses Custodial IRA. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Strike edges out iTrust Capital by 12 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize near-zero fees on some purchases. lightning-native. simple dca. over crypto ira with 30+ assets. 24/7 trading. roth and traditional.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Strike is built for beginners, while iTrust Capital serves crypto ira. One thing to watch with iTrust Capital: single custodian. broad crypto focus, not bitcoin-specialized..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Strike or iTrust Capital?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Strike scores higher at 74/100 compared to 62/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Strike safe for storing Bitcoin?

Strike scored 65/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Single Custodian. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does iTrust Capital have a single point of failure?

Yes. iTrust Capital uses a Custodial IRA model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Strike vs iTrust Capital?

Strike charges ~0.3% spread. iTrust Capital charges 1% per trade. Strike scored 85/100 on fees versus 70/100 for iTrust Capital in our methodology.