Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Sygnum vs Ledn

Sygnum leads overall with a score of 67/100. Sygnum wins in 1 categories, Ledn wins in 3.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportSygnumLedn
Category
Sygnum
B-
Ledn
C
Overall Score
67
58
Custody & Security
35% weight
85
35
Ease of Use
20% weight
65
75
Fees
15% weight
55
65
Features
10% weight
60
70
Transparency
10% weight
70
70
Support
10% weight
75
75
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
85
Sygnum
vs
35
Ledn
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
65
Sygnum
vs
75
Ledn
Fees
15% of overall score
55
Sygnum
vs
65
Ledn
Features
10% of overall score
60
Sygnum
vs
70
Ledn
Transparency
10% of overall score
70
Sygnum
vs
70
Ledn
Support
10% of overall score
75
Sygnum
vs
75
Ledn
Fee Comparison
Sygnum
Custom
Min: CHF 500K
Ledn
Varies by product
Min: $0
Custody Features
Sygnum
Multisig
Multi-Institution
No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
Multi-Jurisdiction
Inheritance
Segregated Insurance
IRA
Lending
Buy/Sell
Dynasty Trusts
Ledn

N/A

Our Analysis

Sygnum vs Ledn: What the Data Shows

Sygnum (dedicated custody) and Ledn (yield and lending) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Sygnum at 67/100 (B-) and Ledn at 58/100 (C). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 50 points toward Sygnum (85 vs. 35). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but Sygnum mitigates it more effectively through its Regulated Bank approach. On fees, Ledn wins by 10 points. Ledn charges Varies by product compared to Custom at Sygnum. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Ledn stands out on ease of use (75 vs. 65), reflecting Ledn's user experience and onboarding flow.

The Custody Question

Neither Sygnum nor Ledn has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Sygnum uses Regulated Bank and Ledn uses Single Custodian. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Sygnum edges out Ledn by 9 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize swiss banking license. tokenization services. regulated digital asset bank. over btc-backed loans. b2x product to double btc exposure. proof of reserves.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Sygnum is built for swiss, while Ledn serves yield seekers. One thing to watch with Ledn: single custodian. rehypothecation concerns. counterparty risk..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Sygnum or Ledn?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Sygnum scores higher at 67/100 compared to 58/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Sygnum safe for storing Bitcoin?

Sygnum scored 85/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Regulated Bank. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does Ledn have a single point of failure?

Yes. Ledn uses a Single Custodian model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Sygnum vs Ledn?

Sygnum charges Custom. Ledn charges Varies by product. Sygnum scored 55/100 on fees versus 65/100 for Ledn in our methodology.