Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Sygnum vs Lolli

Sygnum leads overall with a score of 67/100. Sygnum wins in 3 categories, Lolli wins in 2.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportSygnumLolli
Category
Sygnum
B-
Lolli
C-
Overall Score
67
55
Custody & Security
35% weight
85
30
Ease of Use
20% weight
65
80
Fees
15% weight
55
85
Features
10% weight
60
60
Transparency
10% weight
70
40
Support
10% weight
75
65
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
85
Sygnum
vs
30
Lolli
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
65
Sygnum
vs
80
Lolli
Fees
15% of overall score
55
Sygnum
vs
85
Lolli
Features
10% of overall score
60
Sygnum
vs
60
Lolli
Transparency
10% of overall score
70
Sygnum
vs
40
Lolli
Support
10% of overall score
75
Sygnum
vs
65
Lolli
Fee Comparison
Sygnum
Custom
Min: CHF 500K
Lolli
Free; cashback %
Min: $0
Custody Features
Sygnum
Multisig
Multi-Institution
No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
Multi-Jurisdiction
Inheritance
Segregated Insurance
IRA
Lending
Buy/Sell
Dynasty Trusts
Lolli

N/A

Our Analysis

Sygnum vs Lolli: What the Data Shows

Sygnum (dedicated custody) and Lolli (fintech) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Sygnum scores 67/100 (B-) versus 55/100 (C-) for Lolli. The 12-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 55 points toward Sygnum (85 vs. 30). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but Sygnum mitigates it more effectively through its Regulated Bank approach. On fees, Lolli wins by 30 points. Lolli charges Free; cashback % compared to Custom at Sygnum. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators.

The Custody Question

Neither Sygnum nor Lolli has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Sygnum uses Regulated Bank and Lolli uses Single Custodian. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Sygnum edges out Lolli by 12 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize swiss banking license. tokenization services. regulated digital asset bank. over bitcoin cashback on online shopping. browser extension. 1,000+ merchants.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Sygnum is built for swiss, while Lolli serves shoppers. One thing to watch with Lolli: single custodian. small btc amounts. not a custody solution..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Sygnum or Lolli?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Sygnum scores higher at 67/100 compared to 55/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Sygnum safe for storing Bitcoin?

Sygnum scored 85/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Regulated Bank. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does Lolli have a single point of failure?

Yes. Lolli uses a Single Custodian model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Sygnum vs Lolli?

Sygnum charges Custom. Lolli charges Free; cashback %. Sygnum scored 55/100 on fees versus 85/100 for Lolli in our methodology.