Unchained IRA vs iTrust Capital

Unchained IRA and iTrust Capital both operate in the Bitcoin IRA space, but they take fundamentally different approaches to how your bitcoin is held. Unchained IRA scores 81/100 (B+) versus 62/100 (C+) for iTrust Capital. The 19-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 39 points toward Unchained IRA (84 vs. 45). Unchained IRA eliminates single points of failure in its custody architecture, while iTrust Capital relies on a model where one compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk.

The Custody Question

Here's the key difference: Unchained IRA has no single point of failure (Collaborative Multisig IRA), while iTrust Capital does (Custodial IRA). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.

Bottom Line

Unchained IRA is the clear choice here, outscoring iTrust Capital by 19 points across our six-category methodology. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Unchained IRA is built for self-sovereign retirement, while iTrust Capital serves crypto ira. One thing to watch with iTrust Capital: single custodian. broad crypto focus, not bitcoin-specialized.. The data speaks for itself — but always verify our methodology and do your own due diligence before moving bitcoin to any platform.