Unchained vs Foundation (Passport)
Unchained vs Foundation (Passport): What the Data Shows
Unchained and Foundation (Passport) both operate in the dedicated custody space, but they take fundamentally different approaches to how your bitcoin is held. The scores are close — Unchained at 85/100 (A-) and Foundation (Passport) at 82/100 (A-). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.
Where Each Platform Wins
On custody and security, these two are within 3 points of each other (88 vs. 85). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure. On fees, Foundation (Passport) wins by 12 points. Foundation (Passport) charges ~$200 compared to $250/yr + trading at Unchained. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Unchained's strongest advantage is in features (85 vs. 70), where Unchained's product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference.
The Custody Question
Both Unchained and Foundation (Passport) have addressed the single-point-of-failure problem — neither relies on a single custodian or a single set of keys. That puts both platforms ahead of the majority of the industry. The difference comes down to implementation: Unchained uses Collaborative Multisig, while Foundation (Passport) uses Hardware Wallet.
Bottom Line
Unchained edges out Foundation (Passport) by 3 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize 2-of-3 multisig where client holds 2 keys. strong inheritance and ira products. lending available. over open source hardware and software. beautiful industrial design. bitcoin-only.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Unchained is built for self-sovereign, while Foundation (Passport) serves bitcoin purists. One thing to watch with Foundation (Passport): smaller company. physical exposure risk. self-custody burden..
Which is better, Unchained or Foundation (Passport)?
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Unchained scores higher at 85/100 compared to 82/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Is Unchained safe for storing Bitcoin?
Unchained scored 88/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Collaborative Multisig. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Does Foundation (Passport) have a single point of failure?
No. Foundation (Passport) has eliminated single-point-of-failure risk through its Hardware Wallet model, distributing keys or access across multiple entities.
What are the fees for Unchained vs Foundation (Passport)?
Unchained charges $250/yr + trading. Foundation (Passport) charges ~$200. Unchained scored 78/100 on fees versus 90/100 for Foundation (Passport) in our methodology.