Unchained and Sygnum both operate in the dedicated custody space, but they take fundamentally different approaches to how your bitcoin is held. Unchained scores 85/100 (A-) versus 67/100 (B-) for Sygnum. The 18-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.
On custody and security, these two are within 3 points of each other (88 vs. 85). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure. On fees, Unchained wins by 23 points. Unchained charges $250/yr + trading compared to Custom at Sygnum. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Unchained's strongest advantage is in features (85 vs. 60), where Unchained's product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference.
Here's the key difference: Unchained has no single point of failure (Collaborative Multisig), while Sygnum does (Regulated Bank). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.
Unchained is the clear choice here, outscoring Sygnum by 18 points across our six-category methodology. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Unchained is built for self-sovereign, while Sygnum serves swiss. One thing to watch with Sygnum: single custodian. swiss jurisdiction only. premium pricing.. The data speaks for itself — but always verify our methodology and do your own due diligence before moving bitcoin to any platform.
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Unchained scores higher at 85/100 compared to 67/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Unchained scored 88/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Collaborative Multisig. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Yes. Sygnum uses a Regulated Bank model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
Unchained charges $250/yr + trading. Sygnum charges Custom. Unchained scored 78/100 on fees versus 55/100 for Sygnum in our methodology.
Unchained offers dedicated inheritance or beneficiary features. Sygnum does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.
Unchained's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Sygnum's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.
Unchained involves the holder in key control. Sygnum manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.