PROOFOFCUSTODY
Scores
Incidents
Learn
About
Get the Report
PROOFOFCUSTODY

The independent scoring system for Bitcoin custody. Every platform scored and ranked.

$1B+ in assets under custody expertise

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PLATFORM SCORES
All ScoresCompareMethodologyIndependence StandardDataCustody Assessment
LEARN
Bitcoin 101Custody GuidesCustody InsuranceIs Your Setup Safe?Custody TimelineIncidentsFAQQuiz
COMPANY
AboutAuthorsEditorial IndependenceChangelogCorrections
RESOURCES
PodcastPressReport
CONNECT
Twitter / XLinkedInYouTubehello@proofofcustody.io
2026 Proof of Custody. Published by Onramp Bitcoin. Editorial Independence.PrivacyTermsproofofcustody.io
Back to Scores

Bridge (by Stripe)

B
Stablecoin Orchestration (Stripe-Backed)SPOFDevelopers & Enterprises

Bridge is a stablecoin orchestration platform acquired by Stripe for $1.1B in 2024. It provides APIs for enterprises to issue, transfer, and settle stablecoins across chains. Bridge handles compliance, on/off-ramps, and cross-border stablecoin payments. Backed by Stripe's infrastructure and regulatory relationships.

Visit Bridge (by Stripe)
By Steve L, Editorial Lead·Reviewed by Proof of Custody Editorial
·Last updated Mar 2, 2026
75

Is Bridge (by Stripe) safe for holding bitcoin?

It depends on what you need it to survive. Bridge (by Stripe) runs stablecoin orchestration (stripe-backed) custody, which has a single point of failure: one institution's failure can reach your bitcoin. Proof of Custody scores it 75/100 as of 2026-03-02. The score is an editorial judgement; the facts to check are the custody model, the single point of failure and the incident history below.

Safety record
Custody modelStablecoin Orchestration (Stripe-Backed)
Proof of Custody classification from the provider's own documents
Single point of failureYes: one institution, device or person can move or lose the holding
Record as of 2026-03-02
Who holds the keysNot published in enough detail to state
Independence standard0 of 4 pillars met
InsuranceNot disclosed by the provider
Regulatory standingMoney Transmitter (via Stripe)
Jurisdiction: United States
Qualified custodianNo
Incidents in the registryNone recorded. Absence from the registry is not evidence of safety.
FeesAPI-based pricing
Provider pricing page; verify before relying on it
Minimum$0 (developer integration)
Proof of Custody score75/100
Editorial judgement on the published methodology, as of 2026-03-02

Facts come from the provider's own documents and public filings, with the date they were last checked. The score is Proof of Custody's judgement. Dispute a row through the corrections process.

Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupport
Score Breakdown
Custody & Security35% weight
78
Ease of Use20% weight
80
Fees15% weight
78
Features10% weight
65
Transparency10% weight
65
Support10% weight
65
Assessment
Key Strength

Acquired by Stripe for $1.1B. Stablecoin orchestration layer powering cross-border payments, on/off-ramps, and stablecoin issuance for enterprises. Developer-first API design.

Primary Risk

Newer platform with limited public track record on custody. Stripe acquisition is recent (2024). Infrastructure layer — does not hold reserves directly.

Pros
  • +Stripe backing ($1.1B acquisition)
  • +Developer-first design
  • +Clean API abstractions
  • +Strong cross-border payment use case
Cons
  • -Limited public track record
  • -Does not hold reserves directly
  • -Newer platform
  • -Limited transparency on custody architecture
Custody Features
✕Multisig
✕Multi-Institution
✕No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
✕Proof of Reserves
✕Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
Multi-Jurisdiction
✕Inheritance
✕Segregated Insurance
✕IRA
✕Lending
Buy/Sell
✕Dynasty Trusts
Fees
API-based pricing
Minimum$0 (developer integration)
Regulatory
Jurisdiction
United States
Licenses
Money Transmitter (via Stripe)
Custody Independence Standard
0 of 4 pillars met
Vendor independenceNot met
Entropy independenceNot publicly documented
Control independenceNot met
Operational independenceDepends on configuration

1 independent party or system must fail before a Bridge (by Stripe) holder's bitcoin is at risk.

  • •A single institution controls the keys, so its compromise, insolvency, or unilateral action is sufficient to put funds at risk.
  • •Regulated status and segregation can protect assets in insolvency, but they do not create independence of control.
How this is assessed →
Insurance

Bridge (by Stripe)'s custody insurance is not publicly disclosed.

Frequently asked questions
Is Bridge (by Stripe) safe?+

Bridge (by Stripe) uses a stablecoin orchestration (stripe-backed) model and scores 75/100 in our independent review, including 78/100 on custody security. One institution can move funds, which is a single point of failure. Safety depends on your priorities; see the full score breakdown above.

Is my bitcoin insured at Bridge (by Stripe)?+

Bridge (by Stripe)'s custody insurance is not publicly disclosed in a form we can verify. Where it exists, custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits and does not cover price loss. Confirm coverage in writing before relying on it.

What happens to my bitcoin if Bridge (by Stripe) fails?+

Because Bridge (by Stripe) holds custody through a single institution, recovery in a failure would run through that institution's bankruptcy or resolution process and depends on whether assets were segregated and properly titled. This is the concentration risk of single-custodian models.

Does Bridge (by Stripe) support inheritance?+

Bridge (by Stripe) does not advertise a dedicated inheritance or beneficiary feature in the data we track. Confirm current options with the provider, since custody inheritance handling changes.

Compare

Bridge (by Stripe) vs Others

vs OnrampA
90/100
vs Onramp FinanceA
89/100
vs UnchainedA-
85/100
vs UnchainedA-
84/100