PROOFOFCUSTODY
Scores
Incidents
Learn
About
Get the Report
PROOFOFCUSTODY

The independent scoring system for Bitcoin custody. Every platform scored and ranked.

$1B+ in assets under custody expertise

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PLATFORM SCORES
All ScoresCompareMethodologyIndependence StandardDataCustody Assessment
LEARN
Bitcoin 101Custody GuidesCustody InsuranceIs Your Setup Safe?Custody TimelineIncidentsFAQQuiz
COMPANY
AboutAuthorsEditorial IndependenceChangelogCorrections
RESOURCES
PodcastPressReport
CONNECT
Twitter / XLinkedInYouTubehello@proofofcustody.io
2026 Proof of Custody. Published by Onramp Bitcoin. Editorial Independence.PrivacyTermsproofofcustody.io
Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Onramp Finance vs Franklin Templeton BENJI

Scores last updated September 22, 2026

89
Onramp Finance
ASPOF
Qualified Custodian (BitGo)
78
Franklin Templeton BENJI
B+SPOF
SEC-Registered Fund (Franklin Templeton)
Onramp Finance leads overall with a score of 89/100. Onramp Finance wins in 5 categories, Franklin Templeton BENJI wins in 0.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportOnramp FinanceFranklin Templeton BENJI
Category
Onramp Finance
A
Franklin Templeton BENJI
B+
Overall Score
89
78
Custody & Security
35% weight
95
85
Ease of Use
20% weight
87
72
Fees
15% weight
85
78
Features
10% weight
85
58
Transparency
10% weight
90
90
Support
10% weight
82
70

Who each is for

Fit follows the custody model, not the brand. Both platforms here run the same model, so the honest answer is one answer.

Onramp Finance

Qualified custodian

A regulated institution holds keys in segregated accounts under a legal framework built for it.

A good fit for
  • Entities that must satisfy a regulator, an auditor, or an investment-committee mandate
  • Holders who want institutional process — SOC audits, segregation, named accountability — and accept institutional control
  • Estates and trusts whose lawyers need a counterparty that courts already understand
The wrong choice for
  • Anyone whose core requirement is that no single institution can move the coins — one institution can
  • Privacy-focused holders: the custodian, its regulator, and its subpoena inbox all know your position
  • Small balances: minimums and fees are built for institutions
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
95
Onramp Finance
vs
85
Franklin Templeton BENJI
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
87
Onramp Finance
vs
72
Franklin Templeton BENJI
Fees
15% of overall score
85
Onramp Finance
vs
78
Franklin Templeton BENJI
Features
10% of overall score
85
Onramp Finance
vs
58
Franklin Templeton BENJI
Transparency
10% of overall score
90
Onramp Finance
vs
90
Franklin Templeton BENJI
Support
10% of overall score
82
Onramp Finance
vs
70
Franklin Templeton BENJI
Fee Comparison
Onramp Finance
0.59% one-time
Min: $0
Franklin Templeton BENJI
0.20% expense ratio
Min: $20 (via Benji app)
Custody Features
Onramp Finance

N/A

Franklin Templeton BENJI
✕Multisig
✕Multi-Institution
✕No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
✕Multi-Jurisdiction
✕Inheritance
✕Segregated Insurance
✕IRA
✕Lending
Buy/Sell
✕Dynasty Trusts
Our Analysis

Onramp Finance vs Franklin Templeton BENJI: What the Data Shows

Onramp Finance (exchange and brokerage) and Franklin Templeton BENJI (tokenized-treasury) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Onramp Finance scores 89/100 (A) versus 78/100 (B+) for Franklin Templeton BENJI. The 11-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 10 points toward Onramp Finance (95 vs. 85). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but Onramp Finance mitigates it more effectively through its Qualified Custodian (BitGo) approach. On fees, Onramp Finance wins by 7 points. Onramp Finance charges 0.59% one-time compared to 0.20% expense ratio at Franklin Templeton BENJI. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Onramp Finance's strongest advantage is in features (85 vs. 58), where Onramp Finance's product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference.

The Custody Question

Neither Onramp Finance nor Franklin Templeton BENJI has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Onramp Finance uses Qualified Custodian (BitGo) and Franklin Templeton BENJI uses SEC-Registered Fund (Franklin Templeton). Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Onramp Finance edges out Franklin Templeton BENJI by 11 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize lowest cost one-time buys at 59bps. earn 3% on cash, 1.5% card rewards, lending available. over first sec-registered fund to use public blockchain for share tracking. franklin onchain us government money fund accessible via the benji app. $700m+ aum. stellar and ethereum deployment.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Onramp Finance is built for retail & dca, while Franklin Templeton BENJI serves retail & institutional. One thing to watch with Franklin Templeton BENJI: single asset manager controls fund operations. on-chain component is share tracking, not direct asset custody. minimum investment for direct access..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Onramp Finance or Franklin Templeton BENJI?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Onramp Finance scores higher at 89/100 compared to 78/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Onramp Finance safe for storing Bitcoin?

Onramp Finance scored 95/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Qualified Custodian (BitGo). Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does Franklin Templeton BENJI have a single point of failure?

Yes. Franklin Templeton BENJI uses a SEC-Registered Fund (Franklin Templeton) model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Onramp Finance vs Franklin Templeton BENJI?

Onramp Finance charges 0.59% one-time. Franklin Templeton BENJI charges 0.20% expense ratio. Onramp Finance scored 85/100 on fees versus 78/100 for Franklin Templeton BENJI in our methodology.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better for inheritance, Onramp Finance or Franklin Templeton BENJI?+

Onramp Finance does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Franklin Templeton BENJI does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.

Which has insurance, Onramp Finance or Franklin Templeton BENJI?+

Onramp Finance's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Franklin Templeton BENJI's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.

Which requires me to hold my own keys, Onramp Finance or Franklin Templeton BENJI?+

Onramp Finance manages keys for you; you hold none. Franklin Templeton BENJI manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.

Onramp Finance Full ReviewFranklin Templeton BENJI Full Review