PROOFOFCUSTODY
Scores
Incidents
Learn
About
Get the Report
PROOFOFCUSTODY

The independent scoring system for Bitcoin custody. Every platform scored and ranked.

$1B+ in assets under custody expertise

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PLATFORM SCORES
All ScoresCompareMethodologyIndependence StandardDataCustody Assessment
LEARN
Bitcoin 101Custody GuidesCustody InsuranceIs Your Setup Safe?Custody TimelineIncidentsFAQQuiz
COMPANY
AboutAuthorsEditorial IndependenceChangelogCorrections
RESOURCES
PodcastPressReport
CONNECT
Twitter / XLinkedInYouTubehello@proofofcustody.io
2026 Proof of Custody. Published by Onramp Bitcoin. Editorial Independence.PrivacyTermsproofofcustody.io
Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Onramp Finance vs iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)

Scores last updated September 22, 2026

89
Onramp Finance
ASPOF
Qualified Custodian (BitGo)
77
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
B+SPOF
ETF — Coinbase Custody
Onramp Finance leads overall with a score of 89/100. Onramp Finance wins in 4 categories, iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) wins in 2.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportOnramp FinanceiShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
Category
Onramp Finance
A
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
B+
Overall Score
89
77
Custody & Security
35% weight
95
75
Ease of Use
20% weight
87
90
Fees
15% weight
85
88
Features
10% weight
85
50
Transparency
10% weight
90
80
Support
10% weight
82
65

Who each is for

Fit follows the custody model, not the brand. Both platforms here run the same model, so the honest answer is one answer.

Onramp Finance

Qualified custodian

A regulated institution holds keys in segregated accounts under a legal framework built for it.

A good fit for
  • Entities that must satisfy a regulator, an auditor, or an investment-committee mandate
  • Holders who want institutional process — SOC audits, segregation, named accountability — and accept institutional control
  • Estates and trusts whose lawyers need a counterparty that courts already understand
The wrong choice for
  • Anyone whose core requirement is that no single institution can move the coins — one institution can
  • Privacy-focused holders: the custodian, its regulator, and its subpoena inbox all know your position
  • Small balances: minimums and fees are built for institutions
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
95
Onramp Finance
vs
75
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
87
Onramp Finance
vs
90
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
Fees
15% of overall score
85
Onramp Finance
vs
88
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
Features
10% of overall score
85
Onramp Finance
vs
50
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
Transparency
10% of overall score
90
Onramp Finance
vs
80
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
Support
10% of overall score
82
Onramp Finance
vs
65
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
Fee Comparison
Onramp Finance
0.59% one-time
Min: $0
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)
0.25% expense ratio
Min: $0
Our Analysis

Onramp Finance vs iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT): What the Data Shows

Onramp Finance (exchange and brokerage) and iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) (ETF and fund) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Onramp Finance scores 89/100 (A) versus 77/100 (B+) for iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). The 12-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 20 points toward Onramp Finance (95 vs. 75). Both platforms carry single-point-of-failure risk, but Onramp Finance mitigates it more effectively through its Qualified Custodian (BitGo) approach. Onramp Finance's strongest advantage is in features (85 vs. 50), where Onramp Finance's product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference.

The Custody Question

Neither Onramp Finance nor iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has fully eliminated single-point-of-failure risk. Onramp Finance uses Qualified Custodian (BitGo) and iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) uses ETF — Coinbase Custody. Both models leave your bitcoin exposed to custodial concentration risk — if that one entity fails, your bitcoin could be locked, seized, or lost. For long-term holders, this is the most important factor to weigh.

Bottom Line

Onramp Finance edges out iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) by 12 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize lowest cost one-time buys at 59bps. earn 3% on cash, 1.5% card rewards, lending available. over largest spot bitcoin etf by aum. blackrock brand. deep liquidity.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Onramp Finance is built for retail & dca, while iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) serves tradfi investors. One thing to watch with iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT): single custodian (coinbase). no direct btc withdrawal. counterparty risk via shares..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Onramp Finance or iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Onramp Finance scores higher at 89/100 compared to 77/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Onramp Finance safe for storing Bitcoin?

Onramp Finance scored 95/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It does carry single-point-of-failure risk, meaning your bitcoin depends on one entity's security. Its custody model is classified as Qualified Custodian (BitGo). Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) have a single point of failure?

Yes. iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) uses a ETF — Coinbase Custody model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Onramp Finance vs iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?

Onramp Finance charges 0.59% one-time. iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) charges 0.25% expense ratio. Onramp Finance scored 85/100 on fees versus 88/100 for iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) in our methodology.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better for inheritance, Onramp Finance or iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?+

Onramp Finance does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.

Which has insurance, Onramp Finance or iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?+

Onramp Finance's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)'s custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.

Which requires me to hold my own keys, Onramp Finance or iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?+

Onramp Finance manages keys for you; you hold none. iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.

Onramp Finance Full ReviewiShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) Full Review