N/A
Onramp Lending (yield and lending) and Casa (dedicated custody) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Onramp Lending at 84/100 (A-) and Casa at 83/100 (A-). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.
On custody and security, these two are within 2 points of each other (88 vs. 86). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure.
Both Onramp Lending and Casa have addressed the single-point-of-failure problem — neither relies on a single custodian or a single set of keys. That puts both platforms ahead of the majority of the industry. The difference comes down to implementation: Onramp Lending uses Multi-Institution Collateral, while Casa uses Collaborative Multisig.
Onramp Lending edges out Casa by 1 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize borrow against btc with multi-institution collateral custody. no rehypothecation. over best self-custody ux. mobile key management. inheritance protocol.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Onramp Lending is built for hnw borrowers, while Casa serves self-custody. One thing to watch with Casa: you hold all keys. recovery requires planning. physical exposure risk..
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Onramp Lending scores higher at 84/100 compared to 83/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Onramp Lending scored 88/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Multi-Institution Collateral. Always verify these details and do your own research.
No. Casa has eliminated single-point-of-failure risk through its Collaborative Multisig model, distributing keys or access across multiple entities.
Onramp Lending charges Varies by loan. Casa charges $30 - $250/yr. Onramp Lending scored 76/100 on fees versus 75/100 for Casa in our methodology.
Onramp Lending does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Casa offers dedicated inheritance or beneficiary features. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.
Onramp Lending's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Casa's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.
Onramp Lending manages keys for you; you hold none. Casa involves the holder in key control. This is the core structural difference to weigh.