N/A
Onramp Lending (yield and lending) and Sygnum (dedicated custody) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Onramp Lending scores 84/100 (A-) versus 67/100 (B-) for Sygnum. The 17-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.
On custody and security, these two are within 3 points of each other (88 vs. 85). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure. On fees, Onramp Lending wins by 21 points. Onramp Lending charges Varies by loan compared to Custom at Sygnum. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Onramp Lending's strongest advantage is in features (84 vs. 60), where Onramp Lending's product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference.
Here's the key difference: Onramp Lending has no single point of failure (Multi-Institution Collateral), while Sygnum does (Regulated Bank). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.
Onramp Lending is the clear choice here, outscoring Sygnum by 17 points across our six-category methodology. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Onramp Lending is built for hnw borrowers, while Sygnum serves swiss. One thing to watch with Sygnum: single custodian. swiss jurisdiction only. premium pricing.. The data speaks for itself — but always verify our methodology and do your own due diligence before moving bitcoin to any platform.
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Onramp Lending scores higher at 84/100 compared to 67/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Onramp Lending scored 88/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Multi-Institution Collateral. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Yes. Sygnum uses a Regulated Bank model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
Onramp Lending charges Varies by loan. Sygnum charges Custom. Onramp Lending scored 76/100 on fees versus 55/100 for Sygnum in our methodology.
Onramp Lending does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Sygnum does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.
Onramp Lending's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Sygnum's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.
Onramp Lending manages keys for you; you hold none. Sygnum manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.