Onramp vs Alto IRA

Onramp (dedicated custody) and Alto IRA (Bitcoin IRA) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? In our scoring model, Onramp holds a commanding lead at 90/100 (A) compared to Alto IRA at 60/100 (C). That 30-point gap reflects real, measurable differences in how each platform handles custody, fees, and transparency.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 44 points toward Onramp (94 vs. 50). Onramp eliminates single points of failure in its custody architecture, while Alto IRA relies on a model where one compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. On fees, Onramp wins by 22 points. Onramp charges $250/mo compared to 1% per trade + $10/mo at Alto IRA. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators.

The Custody Question

Here's the key difference: Onramp has no single point of failure (Multi-Institution Custody), while Alto IRA does (Custodial IRA). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.

Bottom Line

Onramp is the clear choice here, outscoring Alto IRA by 30 points across our six-category methodology. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Onramp is built for institutions & hnw, while Alto IRA serves alternative ira. One thing to watch with Alto IRA: single custodian. monthly fees add up. broad focus, not btc-specialized.. The data speaks for itself — but always verify our methodology and do your own due diligence before moving bitcoin to any platform.