Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Onramp vs Casa

Onramp leads overall with a score of 90/100. Onramp wins in 6 categories, Casa wins in 0.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportOnrampCasa
Category
Onramp
A
Casa
A-
Overall Score
90
83
Custody & Security
35% weight
94
86
Ease of Use
20% weight
86
78
Fees
15% weight
82
75
Features
10% weight
88
82
Transparency
10% weight
90
84
Support
10% weight
92
85
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
94
Onramp
vs
86
Casa
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
86
Onramp
vs
78
Casa
Fees
15% of overall score
82
Onramp
vs
75
Casa
Features
10% of overall score
88
Onramp
vs
82
Casa
Transparency
10% of overall score
90
Onramp
vs
84
Casa
Support
10% of overall score
92
Onramp
vs
85
Casa
Fee Comparison
Onramp
$250/mo
Min: $100K
Casa
$30 - $250/yr
Min: $0
Custody Features
Onramp
Multisig
Multi-Institution
No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
Multi-Jurisdiction
Inheritance
Segregated Insurance
IRA
Lending
Buy/Sell
Dynasty Trusts
Casa
Multisig
Multi-Institution
No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
Multi-Jurisdiction
Inheritance
Segregated Insurance
IRA
Lending
Buy/Sell
Dynasty Trusts
Our Analysis

Onramp vs Casa: What the Data Shows

Onramp and Casa both operate in the dedicated custody space, but they take fundamentally different approaches to how your bitcoin is held. The scores are close — Onramp at 90/100 (A) and Casa at 83/100 (A-). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 8 points toward Onramp (94 vs. 86). On fees, Onramp wins by 7 points. Onramp charges $250/mo compared to $30 - $250/yr at Casa. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators.

The Custody Question

Both Onramp and Casa have addressed the single-point-of-failure problem — neither relies on a single custodian or a single set of keys. That puts both platforms ahead of the majority of the industry. The difference comes down to implementation: Onramp uses Multi-Institution Custody, while Casa uses Self-Custody Multisig.

Bottom Line

Onramp edges out Casa by 7 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize only platform distributing keys across multiple regulated custodians and jurisdictions. inheritance, dynasty trusts, insurance on segregated incidents. over best self-custody ux. mobile key management. inheritance protocol.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Onramp is built for institutions & hnw, while Casa serves self-custody. One thing to watch with Casa: you hold all keys. recovery requires planning. physical exposure risk..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Onramp or Casa?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Onramp scores higher at 90/100 compared to 83/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Onramp safe for storing Bitcoin?

Onramp scored 94/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Multi-Institution Custody. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does Casa have a single point of failure?

No. Casa has eliminated single-point-of-failure risk through its Self-Custody Multisig model, distributing keys or access across multiple entities.

What are the fees for Onramp vs Casa?

Onramp charges $250/mo. Casa charges $30 - $250/yr. Onramp scored 82/100 on fees versus 75/100 for Casa in our methodology.