PROOFOFCUSTODY
Scores
Incidents
Learn
About
Get the Report
PROOFOFCUSTODY

The independent scoring system for Bitcoin custody. Every platform scored and ranked.

$1B+ in assets under custody expertise

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PLATFORM SCORES
All ScoresCompareMethodologyIndependence StandardDataCustody Assessment
LEARN
Bitcoin 101Custody GuidesCustody InsuranceIs Your Setup Safe?Custody TimelineIncidentsFAQQuiz
COMPANY
AboutAuthorsEditorial IndependenceChangelogCorrections
RESOURCES
PodcastPressReport
CONNECT
Twitter / XLinkedInYouTubehello@proofofcustody.io
2026 Proof of Custody. Published by Onramp Bitcoin. Editorial Independence.PrivacyTermsproofofcustody.io
Back to Scores
Head-to-Head Comparison

Onramp vs Paxos Gold (PAXG)

Scores last updated September 27, 2026

90
Onramp
ADistributed
Multi-Institution Custody
76
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
BSPOF
Brink's Vaults + NY DFS Regulated
Onramp leads overall with a score of 90/100. Onramp wins in 6 categories, Paxos Gold (PAXG) wins in 0.
Custody & SecurityEase of UseFeesFeaturesTransparencySupportOnrampPaxos Gold (PAXG)
Category
Onramp
A
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
B
Overall Score
90
76
Custody & Security
35% weight
97
85
Ease of Use
20% weight
87
75
Fees
15% weight
84
72
Features
10% weight
88
50
Transparency
10% weight
90
85
Support
10% weight
80
70

Who each is for

Fit follows the custody model, not the brand. Both platforms here run the same model, so the honest answer is one answer.

Onramp

Multi-institution custody

Separate institutions each hold a key under their own ceremony; no one of them can move funds.

A good fit for
  • Holders who want independence to be structural rather than a personal discipline — the separation survives your attention span, your health, and your heirs
  • The person planning for a non-technical survivor: the heir works with institutions and documents, not devices and dice
  • Advisors, trusts, and family offices that need no-single-point-of-failure custody they can explain to a fiduciary
The wrong choice for
  • Holders whose definition of bitcoin includes holding a key personally — you do not hold one, and no amount of structure changes that
  • Small balances: institutional fee floors make no sense under six figures
  • Privacy maximalists: multiple regulated institutions know the position
  • Anyone who wants to be able to move coins alone at 2am — the design goal is precisely that nobody can
Category Breakdown
Custody & Security
35% of overall score
97
Onramp
vs
85
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
Ease of Use
20% of overall score
87
Onramp
vs
75
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
Fees
15% of overall score
84
Onramp
vs
72
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
Features
10% of overall score
88
Onramp
vs
50
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
Transparency
10% of overall score
90
Onramp
vs
85
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
Support
10% of overall score
80
Onramp
vs
70
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
Fee Comparison
Onramp
$250/mo
Min: $100K
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
0.02% on-chain transfer fee
Min: $20 (on exchanges)
Custody Features
Onramp
Multisig
Multi-Institution
No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
Multi-Jurisdiction
Inheritance
Segregated Insurance
IRA
Lending
Buy/Sell
Dynasty Trusts
Paxos Gold (PAXG)
✕Multisig
✕Multi-Institution
✕No Single Point of Failure
Segregated Accounts
Proof of Reserves
Insurance
Regulated Custodian
No Physical Exposure
✕Multi-Jurisdiction
✕Inheritance
✕Segregated Insurance
✕IRA
✕Lending
Buy/Sell
✕Dynasty Trusts
Our Analysis

Onramp vs Paxos Gold (PAXG): What the Data Shows

Onramp (dedicated custody) and Paxos Gold (PAXG) (tokenized-gold) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Onramp scores 90/100 (A) versus 76/100 (B) for Paxos Gold (PAXG). The 14-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.

Where Each Platform Wins

Custody and security — the most heavily weighted category in our methodology at 35% — tilts 12 points toward Onramp (97 vs. 85). Onramp eliminates single points of failure in its custody architecture, while Paxos Gold (PAXG) relies on a model where one compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. On fees, Onramp wins by 12 points. Onramp charges $250/mo compared to 0.02% on-chain transfer fee at Paxos Gold (PAXG). Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators. Onramp's strongest advantage is in features (88 vs. 50), where Onramp's product breadth and tooling makes a measurable difference.

The Custody Question

Here's the key difference: Onramp has no single point of failure (Multi-Institution Custody), while Paxos Gold (PAXG) does (Brink's Vaults + NY DFS Regulated). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.

Bottom Line

Onramp edges out Paxos Gold (PAXG) by 14 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize only platform with multiple regulated custodians and jurisdictions. inheritance, dynasty trusts, insurance on segregated incidents. over each paxg token backed by one troy ounce of london good delivery gold in brink's vaults. ny dfs regulated. monthly attestations. unique: individual bar serial number lookup per token holder.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Onramp is built for institutions & hnw, while Paxos Gold (PAXG) serves gold investors & institutions. One thing to watch with Paxos Gold (PAXG): paxos as single issuer and regulatory entity. physical gold concentration in london vaults. minimum 430 paxg ($1m+) for physical redemption..

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Onramp or Paxos Gold (PAXG)?

Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Onramp scores higher at 90/100 compared to 76/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.

Is Onramp safe for storing Bitcoin?

Onramp scored 97/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Multi-Institution Custody. Always verify these details and do your own research.

Does Paxos Gold (PAXG) have a single point of failure?

Yes. Paxos Gold (PAXG) uses a Brink's Vaults + NY DFS Regulated model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.

What are the fees for Onramp vs Paxos Gold (PAXG)?

Onramp charges $250/mo. Paxos Gold (PAXG) charges 0.02% on-chain transfer fee. Onramp scored 84/100 on fees versus 72/100 for Paxos Gold (PAXG) in our methodology.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better for inheritance, Onramp or Paxos Gold (PAXG)?+

Onramp offers dedicated inheritance or beneficiary features. Paxos Gold (PAXG) does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.

Which has insurance, Onramp or Paxos Gold (PAXG)?+

Onramp carries insurance of up to $100 million per incident, through Lloyd's of London. Paxos Gold (PAXG)'s custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.

Which requires me to hold my own keys, Onramp or Paxos Gold (PAXG)?+

Onramp manages keys for you; you hold none. Paxos Gold (PAXG) manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.

Onramp Full ReviewPaxos Gold (PAXG) Full Review