Scores last updated
Fit follows the custody model, not the brand.
You hold most keys, the provider holds one, and no single party can move funds alone.
A regulated institution holds keys in segregated accounts under a legal framework built for it.
N/A
Unchained (exchange and brokerage) and Anchorage Digital (stablecoin-custody) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? Unchained scores 84/100 (A-) versus 71/100 (B-) for Anchorage Digital. The 13-point spread is meaningful — it usually comes down to custody architecture and fee structure.
On custody and security, these two are within 3 points of each other (88 vs. 85). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure. On fees, Unchained wins by 23 points. Unchained charges 1% + trading spread compared to Custom institutional pricing at Anchorage Digital. Over a multi-year holding period, fee differences compound — a point worth considering for long-term accumulators.
Here's the key difference: Unchained has no single point of failure (Collaborative Multisig), while Anchorage Digital does (OCC-Chartered Crypto Bank). This matters because a single-point-of-failure model means one compromised entity — whether through a hack, insolvency, or government action — could result in total loss of funds. History has proven this risk is not theoretical. FTX, Celsius, and BlockFi all represented single points of failure for their users.
Unchained edges out Anchorage Digital by 13 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize buy directly into collaborative custody. ira, lending, and inheritance built in. over first occ-chartered crypto bank. custodies stablecoin reserves for multiple issuers. soc 1 & 2 compliant. banking-grade custody infrastructure for digital assets.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Unchained is built for self-sovereign, while Anchorage Digital serves institutions & stablecoin issuers. One thing to watch with Anchorage Digital: does not use multisig — relies on proprietary key management. single institutional custodian. premium pricing limits access. occ charter is novel and untested in stress scenarios..
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Unchained scores higher at 84/100 compared to 71/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Unchained scored 88/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Collaborative Multisig. Always verify these details and do your own research.
Yes. Anchorage Digital uses a OCC-Chartered Crypto Bank model, which means a single compromised entity could put your bitcoin at risk. This is a structural concern for long-term holders.
Unchained charges 1% + trading spread. Anchorage Digital charges Custom institutional pricing. Unchained scored 78/100 on fees versus 55/100 for Anchorage Digital in our methodology.
Unchained does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Anchorage Digital does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.
Unchained's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Anchorage Digital's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.
Unchained involves the holder in key control. Anchorage Digital manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.