Scores last updated
Fit follows the custody model, not the brand.
You hold most keys, the provider holds one, and no single party can move funds alone.
Separate institutions each hold a key under their own ceremony; no one of them can move funds.
Unchained (exchange and brokerage) and Onramp Lending (yield and lending) serve different corners of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but the question that matters most is the same: who controls the keys? The scores are close — Unchained at 84/100 (A-) and Onramp Lending at 83/100 (A-). When the gap is this narrow, the details matter: custody model, single points of failure, and the fine print on fees.
On custody and security, these two are within 0 points of each other (88 vs. 88). When custody scores are this close, look at the specifics: key management model, insurance coverage, and whether either platform has a single point of failure.
Both Unchained and Onramp Lending have addressed the single-point-of-failure problem — neither relies on a single custodian or a single set of keys. That puts both platforms ahead of the majority of the industry. The difference comes down to implementation: Unchained uses Collaborative Multisig, while Onramp Lending uses Multi-Institution Collateral.
Unchained edges out Onramp Lending by 1 points. It's a close call, and the right choice depends on your specific situation — how much bitcoin you're holding, how often you need access, and whether you prioritize buy directly into collaborative custody. ira, lending, and inheritance built in. over borrow against btc with multi-institution collateral custody. no rehypothecation.. Keep in mind these platforms target different audiences — Unchained is built for self-sovereign, while Onramp Lending serves hnw borrowers. One thing to watch with Onramp Lending: higher minimums. newer lending product. liquidation risk in volatility..
Based on our six-category scoring methodology, Unchained scores higher at 84/100 compared to 83/100. The biggest differentiator is custody security, which accounts for 35% of the overall score. However, the right choice depends on your individual needs — review the category breakdown above.
Unchained scored 88/100 on custody and security in our methodology. It has no single point of failure, distributing custody across multiple entities. Its custody model is classified as Collaborative Multisig. Always verify these details and do your own research.
No. Onramp Lending has eliminated single-point-of-failure risk through its Multi-Institution Collateral model, distributing keys or access across multiple entities.
Unchained charges 1% + trading spread. Onramp Lending charges Varies by loan. Unchained scored 78/100 on fees versus 78/100 for Onramp Lending in our methodology.
Unchained does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Onramp Lending does not advertise a dedicated inheritance feature. Match the mechanism, whether beneficiary designation, trust titling, or key inheritance, to your estate plan.
Unchained's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Onramp Lending's custody insurance is not publicly disclosed. Custody insurance covers specific named events up to shared limits, not price loss or every failure mode. Verify current terms before relying on coverage.
Unchained involves the holder in key control. Onramp Lending manages keys for you; you hold none. This is the core structural difference to weigh.