PROOFOFCUSTODY
Scores
Incidents
Learn
About
Get the Report
PROOFOFCUSTODY

The independent scoring system for Bitcoin custody. Every platform scored and ranked.

$1B+ in assets under custody expertise

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PLATFORM SCORES
All ScoresCompareMethodologyIndependence StandardDataCustody Assessment
LEARN
Bitcoin 101Custody GuidesCustody InsuranceIs Your Setup Safe?Custody TimelineIncidentsFAQQuiz
COMPANY
AboutAuthorsEditorial IndependenceChangelogCorrections
RESOURCES
PodcastPressReport
CONNECT
Twitter / XLinkedInYouTubehello@proofofcustody.io
2026 Proof of Custody. Published by Onramp Bitcoin. Editorial Independence.PrivacyTermsproofofcustody.io
Situation

My spouse could not run a hardware wallet. What still works if I am gone?

It depends on one thing: what the person who must recover can actually do, on a bad day, without you. If they cannot run a hardware wallet and handle a seed phrase, then every model that needs them to is out, however well it scores for you. That leaves the models where the recoverer deals with institutions and documents: multi-institution custody, a qualified custodian, or collaborative multisig only where the provider documents an assisted inheritance path they can follow with support. The trade is explicit: less for your spouse to do means more reliance on institutions, so the columns to read are who can move funds and what happens when one party fails.

What decides it
  • Recovery capability of the survivor, not of you
  • Whether the provider documents an inheritance process the survivor can actually follow
  • Single point of failure at the institution level
  • Fee floor against the holding

Which custody models fit, by the published rules

Fit engine rules 0.1 (1 Nov 2026), with this situation's inputs preset. Adjust the inputs to your own case. Proof of Custody is published by Onramp Bitcoin, which appears here where its custody model fits and is scored by the same methodology as every other platform.

Multi-institution custody
fits · 90
  • The recoverer works with identity documents and institutions, not devices.
  • Long horizons favour structures that do not depend on one party staying solvent and competent.
  • Heirs deal with institutions and paperwork, not devices.

Recovery: Identity and authority documents to the institutions; no device, seed or ceremony on the heir's side.

Onramp90publisherOnramp Lending83publisher
Spot bitcoin ETF
fits · 80
  • The recoverer works with identity documents and institutions, not devices.
  • Ordinary brokerage estate process.

Recovery: The brokerage's beneficiary or estate process; no keys involved.

iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)77Fidelity Wise Origin (FBTC)76Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB)74ARK 21Shares (ARKB)70Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC)70Grayscale Bitcoin Mini (BTC)69
Qualified custodian
fits · 80
  • The recoverer works with identity documents and institutions, not devices.
  • A succession procedure exists.

Recovery: Identity and authority documents to the custodian; the custodian's own succession procedure.

Onramp Finance89publisherFidelity Digital Assets76Choice by Kingdom Trust73Choice by Kingdom Trust73BitGo71Sygnum70
Exchange or single-custodian account
fits · 75
  • The recoverer works with identity documents and institutions, not devices.
  • An estate process exists, with counterparty risk attached.

Recovery: Prove identity and, for an estate, present letters of administration to the company's support desk.

River82Swan Bitcoin80Fidelity Crypto74Strike74Strike (Global)70Cash App69

Excluded by the rules: Collaborative multisig (Recovery floor: this model requires the recoverer to run a hardware wallet and handle a seed phrase, and the person you named cannot be expected to.); Self-managed multi-vendor multisig (Recovery floor: this model requires the recoverer to run a hardware wallet and handle a seed phrase, and the person you named cannot be expected to.); Single-signature hardware wallet (Recovery floor: this model requires the recoverer to run a hardware wallet and handle a seed phrase, and the person you named cannot be expected to.)

These are custody models that fit the situation described, by Proof of Custody's published rules, version 0.1 (1 Nov 2026). They are not a recommendation to buy, sell, move or hold anything, and not legal, tax or estate advice.

Tests to run on any provider you shortlist

Buyer refuses to manage any hardware

The buyer will not store a device, will not write down a seed phrase, and will not be responsible for anything physical.

  • No hardware device required of the buyer at setup or for ongoing access
  • No seed phrase or backup material held by the buyer
  • Access through software the buyer already uses, with account recovery that does not depend on the buyer's own key material
  • A documented path for the buyer's heirs that also requires no hardware
Inheritance for a non-technical spouse

The holder wants a spouse with no bitcoin experience to be able to reach the funds after their death without hiring an expert.

  • A written procedure the surviving spouse can follow without understanding keys, wallets or the blockchain
  • A named human or institution the spouse can contact, with a stated response commitment
  • A path that does not require probate, or a clear statement that probate is required
  • The procedure is testable while the holder is alive
Routing row INH-02

Agent tool: fit_custody_setup. Primary sources: poc-scores. Refresh: rules versioned. All routes.

Retiree with three heirs →Custody models: who each is for →
Add to your agent

Free, read-only, no key. Every answer carries its source URL, as-of date and the publisher disclosure.

Add to ClaudeAdd to CursorAdd to VS CodeChatGPT and other agents →